Genetic Testing for Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis: What to Do When It Is Not Williams Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the frequency and yield of genetic testing in supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS) following negative evaluation for Williams-Beuren syndrome (WS). METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with SVAS at our institution who had a negative evaluation for WS from May 1991 to September 2021. SVAS was defined as (1) peak supravalvar velocity of ≥2 meters/second, (2) sinotubular junction or ascending aortic Z score <-2.0, or (3) sinotubular junction Z score <-1.5 with family history of SVAS. Patients with complex congenital heart disease, aortic valve disease as the primary condition, or only postoperative SVAS were excluded. Genetic testing and diagnoses were reported. Of 162 patients who were WS negative meeting inclusion criteria, 61 had genetic testing results available (38%). Chromosomal microarray had been performed in 44 of 61 and was nondiagnostic for non-WS causes of SVAS. Sequencing of 1 or more genes was performed in 47 of 61. Of these, 39 of 47 underwent ELN sequencing, 20 of 39 (51%) of whom had a diagnostic variant. Other diagnoses made by gene sequencing were Noonan syndrome (3 PTPN11, 1 RIT1), Alagille syndrome (3 JAG1), neurofibromatosis (1 NF1), and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (1 LDLR1). Overall, sequencing was diagnostic in 29 of 47 (62%). CONCLUSIONS: When WS is excluded, gene sequencing for SVAS is high yield, with the highest yield for the ELN gene. Therefore, we recommend gene sequencing using a multigene panel or exome analysis. Hypercholesterolemia can also be considered in individuals bearing the stigmata of this disease.

Evaluating Variation in the Cardiac Management of Children with Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Disease in the United States.

Hereditary thoracic aortic diseases (HTAD) such as Marfan syndrome (MFS), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) frequently result in complex cardiovascular pathology that can lead to premature death. However, given limited research and lack of detailed pediatric management guidelines, practice in the U.S. is largely guided by personal experience and/or advice from other professionals. A REDCap survey was composed that covered topics including genetic testing, imaging, and medication choice (all in children), among others. After piloting, the survey was distributed via email and advertised on PediHeartNet. Email addresses of providers were obtained through an established aortic research collaborative and a clinic directory offered through The Marfan Foundation. There were 64 survey responses (pediatric cardiologists 66%; geneticists 13%, genetic counselors 6%; the remaining 15% was comprised of a combination of cardiothoracic surgeons, adult cardiologists, adult congenital specialists, combined cardiology and genetics specialist, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse coordinators). The most supported indication for genetic evaluation in a child with mild aortic root dilation was family history of thoracic aortic dissection (100%), in contrast to mild root dilation with no other HTAD features (39% supported, 45% did not, 15% saying it would depend on other factors). The majority would start medical therapy in MFS at an aortic root z-score of 2, however differences existed regarding medication preferences for initiation (47% angiotensin receptor blockers, 36% beta blockers, 17% would not or cannot prescribe medication/defer medication choice to another provider). Variation existed for cross-sectional imaging indications and modality and for exercise restrictions, although on average respondents were more lenient than the Bethesda guidelines. While there are areas of general agreement in the cardiac management of children with HTAD, there are also several areas of considerable variation. This highlights the need for additional study in these areas with the ultimate goal of creating consensus guidelines.